An Alaska lawmaker has been censured after asking whether fatal child abuse could actually serve as a "benefit to society".
Representative David Eastman asked the experts how they would respond to what he said was an argument that "in the case where child abuse is fatal, obviously it's not good for the child, but it's actually a benefit to society because there aren't needs for government services and whatnot over the whole course of that child's life?"
Farther and farther out these hierarchy supporters have to go in order to stay on the seesaw.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64726727
